Conspiracy Theorists: Dangerous Losers

14th April 2007

Conspiracy Theorists: Dangerous Losers

posted in Culture, Politics |

I just mentioned a great essay that logically dismantles many of the left's favorite arguments and slogans; a follow-up post debunks many modern conspiracy theories. Included are

The Moon Landing
JFK's Assassination
Chemtrails
9/11 Conspiracies, including
- Fire Can't Melt Steel
- Twin Towers Rigged to Implode
- A Missile Hit the Pentagon, Not American Airlines Flight 77

A couple of quotes…

I know this is harsh, but I’m sick of watching the damage they are doing to this civilization: these people are, to a man, complete losers. Losers. They are desperate and sad people who need to believe in some dark secret to give meaning to their lives.

And…

[W]hat kind of moral universe do you have to inhabit to be able to believe that your own people – airline personnel, demolition experts, police and security forces, faked witnesses and all the rest – are capable of such a thing? How much hate for your own society do you have to carry in order to live in such a desolate and ridiculous mental hell? What psychoses must a mind be riddled with in order to negate what was perfectly obvious and instead believe a theory of such monumental fantasy? How much pure constant hatred does that take?

What, in short, is the miserable black hole of self-loathing that drives a person like Rosie O’Donnell and millions like her?

And finally…

[T]he 9/11 Truth crowd when confronted with the lunacy of their claims [responds] We’re just asking questions…

Well, in that vein I’d like to ask some questions myself. Is Michael Moore a serial pedophile? I’m just asking, and I’m sure a lot of my readers would just like to have some questions answered. I heard that Rosie O’Donell ate a baby at a Satanic Ritual once – is that true? Can you please provide the evidence that this did not in fact happen? Thanks. Who has murdered more hookers: Bill Maher or Charlie Sheen? Come on, you can’t tell me there’s no smoke there. I just want a possible explanation…

The essay is Seeing the Unseen, Part 2.

Share and Enjoy:

This entry was posted on Saturday, April 14th, 2007 at 22:15 and is filed under Culture, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

1 On April 15th, 2007, Not from the left said:

About your statement "the left's favorite arguments."; For the sake of argument, it is the right that used every drop of 9/11 for political gain. So your twisted morality is basically saying that it is ok for the neo-cons (means leftist disguised as a righty) to BENEFIT from the murders of thousands upon thousands of people. One of the first steps to finding the perpe-traitors is to find out who benefits and that is quite obvious from the PNAC document Jeb Bush, George, Dick Cheney (Lon), Bill Crystal, and Wolfowitz all signed, [who], intended to benefit from a "new pearl harbor event."
Besides, it's obvious you are a Rhodes scholar shill because a retarded child can see building 7 was a controlled demolition. And if you aren't a Rhodes pig, and are in reality a dumb ass, the significance of controlled demolition is that it takes weeks to set up a building to come down in PERFECT ballet fashion as # 7 did. I see you still have that blank look in your eyes. TWO WEEKS MEANS BEFORE 9/11. If you are not a liar………..GOOGLE COLLAPSE OF BUILDING 7

2 On April 15th, 2007, SteveO said:

So, the party that's strong on national defense looks better than the party of appeasement; that means they planned and executed the whole thing.

And they found hundreds, if not thousands, of experts to pull the whole thing off, and no one on the outside learned of the plan, or even noticed the demolition charges and wires. Further, every single one of those who went along with killing their countrymen has remained quiet to this day — they must be fiercely loyal!

If I were you, I'd take steps to conceal my identity, because if you get too close to the truth, you'll be eliminated.