Acme Anvil Co. - This Ain't Exactly Rocket Science

26th January 2008

Michael Crichton - Environmentalism as Religion

posted in Environment |

Some excerpts:

Today, one of the most powerful religions in the Western World is environmentalism. Environmentalism seems to be the religion of choice for urban atheists. Why do I say it's a religion? Well, just look at the beliefs. If you look carefully, you see that environmentalism is in fact a perfect 21st century remapping of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs and myths.

There's an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there's a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a judgment day coming for us all. We are all energy sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability. Sustainability is salvation in the church of the environment. Just as organic food is its communion, that pesticide-free wafer that the right people with the right beliefs, imbibe.

. . .

You may have noticed that something has been left off the doomsday list, lately. Although the preachers of environmentalism have been yelling about population for fifty years, over the last decade world population seems to be taking an unexpected turn. Fertility rates are falling almost everywhere…. There are some who think that world population will peak in 2050 and then start to decline. There are some who predict we will have fewer people in 2100 than we do today. Is this a reason to rejoice, to say halleluiah? Certainly not. Without a pause, we now hear about the coming crisis of world economy from a shrinking population. We hear about the impending crisis of an aging population. Nobody anywhere will say that the core fears expressed for most of my life have turned out not to be true. As we have moved into the future, these doomsday visions vanished, like a mirage in the desert. They were never there—though they still appear, in the future. As mirages do.

. . .

So I can tell you some facts. I know you haven't read any of what I am about to tell you in the newspaper, because newspapers literally don't report them. I can tell you that DDT is not a carcinogen and did not cause birds to die and should never have been banned. I can tell you that the people who banned it knew that it wasn't carcinogenic and banned it anyway. I can tell you that the DDT ban has caused the deaths of tens of millions of poor people, mostly children, whose deaths are directly attributable to a callous, technologically advanced western society that promoted the new cause of environmentalism by pushing a fantasy about a pesticide, and thus irrevocably harmed the third world. Banning DDT is one of the most disgraceful episodes in the twentieth century history of America. We knew better, and we did it anyway, and we let people around the world die and didn't give a damn.

. . .

Because in the end, science offers us the only way out of politics. And if we allow science to become politicized, then we are lost. We will enter the Internet version of the dark ages, an era of shifting fears and wild prejudices, transmitted to people who don't know any better. That's not a good future for the human race. That's our past. So it's time to abandon the religion of environmentalism, and return to the science of environmentalism, and base our public policy decisions firmly on that.

Read the whole thing:

MichaelCrichton.com | Environmentalism as Religion

Share and Enjoy:
  • blogmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Smarking
  • YahooMyWeb

There are currently 2 responses to “Michael Crichton - Environmentalism as Religion”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On January 28th, 2008, Ed Darrell said:

    I can tell you that DDT is not a carcinogen and did not cause birds to die and should never have been banned. I can tell you that the people who banned it knew that it wasn't carcinogenic and banned it anyway. I can tell you that the DDT ban has caused the deaths of tens of millions of poor people, mostly children, whose deaths are directly attributable to a callous, technologically advanced western society that promoted the new cause of environmentalism by pushing a fantasy about a pesticide, and thus irrevocably harmed the third world. Banning DDT is one of the most disgraceful episodes in the twentieth century history of America. We knew better, and we did it anyway, and we let people around the world die and didn't give a damn.

    Oh, you could tell us that — but each part of that case would be a lie. Lying is a sin.

    DDT is an animal carcinogen, and a probable human carcinogen according to every cancer-fighting agency on Earth. Claiming otherwise would be one lie.

    DDT kills birds, and mammals, outright in big enough doses. More damaging, it disrupts reproduction, and in birds it makes the eggshells too thin for the embryo to survive and deforms the chicks so that if they do hatch, they die quickly. Claiming no harm to birds would be a second lie.

    When William Ruckelshaus banned DDT from broadcast use, he had good information that the stuff is carcinogenic (lie number three for Crichton), but the ban was primarily because it damages birds and other wildlife in the environment — lie number four.

    The DDT ban didn't come soon enough. DDT ceased being effective against malaria-carrying mosquitoes in Africa, Asia, and other places, prior to the ban. Had DDT been banned in 1958 for agricultural use, it might still be very effective against malaria vector mosquitoes. Claims that the ban on DDT stopped any spraying are specious — several nations stopped using it years before the ban, because it had stopped working.

    Failing to ban the overuse of DDT probably sped it's unusefulness, costing several tens of thousands of lives.

    Lie number 5.

    If Crichton gave a damn today, he'd stop spreading lies like that.

    Lie number 6.

    How many lies will you take from one guy?

  2. 2 On January 30th, 2008, SteveO said:

    100 Things You Should Know About DDT

Leave a Reply