Reasons Not to Vote for Mitt Romney

Acme Anvil Co. - This Ain't Exactly Rocket Science

3rd February 2008

Reasons Not to Vote for Mitt Romney

posted in Politics |

Including:

Thinking his sons working to get him elected equates to servicemen and women fighting in Iraq and Afganistan
Sticking his dog inside a cage on top of his car for a 12-hour ride across country, hosing the dog's diarrhea off the car and off the dog at a rest stop, and then resuming the trip (wet dog + 55mph wind?)
Does anyone think he'd get nearly as much attention if he weren't so darned pretty and willing to spend so much of his own money? (at least $35 million through December)

WuzzaDem has the breakdown.

I recommend Mike Huckabee — a true conservative.

Share and Enjoy:

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 3rd, 2008 at 14:54 and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There is currently one response to “Reasons Not to Vote for Mitt Romney”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

1 On February 4th, 2008, JohnB said:
The real reason Romney is still in the race is:

His staff is feeding his ego so they have a job for a flew more weeks, that is why the Fred's came on board. Seriously, if he had a staff of honest people they would have told him after New Hampshire his message had no traction and he would not win or even last the month even if he put in 20 million or so. Wait he put in maybe 40 million and will last the month of February; if he is lucky. The problem for Huckabee is that he was drowned out with Mits robo calls and tv ads attaching him in the Granate State (New Hampshire); After talking to my republican friends up there I thought he was a Clinton. Maybe someone should check He also seems to have some strange hold of some of the media, this I am certain of, just like Bill did before he won.

I could not vote for Mit, on Tuesday not because of the above but for having to with the rest of you shell out 1 billion dollars for the Winter Olympics, and how poorly he ran the Commonwealth of Mass.
(it does not deserve State status, sorry Virgina)

I am uncertain about McCain or Huckabee, never met either of them. I really dislike the negative stuff said about McCain's military record. It is clear to me that the attacks are crap. an apartment in Hanoi with two prostitutes, yea right there were none in Hanoi then, maybe in South Vietnam; one only has to see his medical record to see that he was not favored over the other POWs. Vietnamese is a language that is easily translatable by most of us, so the bit that it was not fully translated is bull. I could get it translated by next week as a quarter of the people in this country can. Some of the other Attacks on McCain are coming from Republican Leaders charged , with corruption, did Mitt promises them amnesty, for their support?

Also the fact of McCain being unbalanced is junk, he was a Captain in the Navy. That is not like a Captain in the Army but like a full Col. Sorry the Navy fitness test would of junked him before promoting him; no matter who his Dad is; seen it. It is clear to anyone why he left, it was time to get on with his life and move on from being a POW (that is probably why he did not play it up in his first campaign.) He was part of the group that revitalized this country, especially the military under Reagen.

I do like Mike, in that he took and takes care of his wife. It is very hard thing to do. I know that by my experiences; taking care of family is the hardest thing I have done. He is in favor of changing the tax system, which currently is cause for corruption and failure of are ability to make anything. The world has changed we are part of a Global Economy so having people buy more goods will not help us. Once again, knowledge of business is not economic knowledge. In fact it is a bit counter. Mitt may be smart but he certainly is not bright; Huck is bright as is McCain (IQ over 130; both of them realize that they need a competent staff to make economic policy. It is no longer a simple matter of low taxes; imports, lack of manufacturing are main issues. Not selling stuff like Mitt.

So if I am feeling good by Tuesday I will vote for one of them; I am feeling really under the weather this weekend. I do need to find out a little about Mike, he does come across a true Gentleman, is on the right side of the only two issues I care about like and the war (to many young friends there) but I have been fooled before. If the economy fails so be it, but I lost either directly or indirectly most of my older friends from when I was young from the Vietnam. There were alot of lives lost and broken, even mine a little indirectly; for what we lost the war; and the ones that came back were insulted denied employment. And I do not want that to happen again. We need to win this war (I had the Husband of a former Girl Friend killed on 9-11 (he was a much nicer guy then I, so I never held a grudge) as well as one of Neighbor kids, I was going to be there the next week, I use to have an office there (actually a glorifed mail drop) the Twin Towers were very dear to me, I visited them when they were being built and even discussed of all things the fire protection with my professor who was a consultant on that even to the point of talking about if a plane accidentally ran in to one. We need to quit importing Oil or we will be back there again and again. Life has changed since 9-11 . I know that Romney was not in Vietnam as he would of been fraged.